Expert Sign Up
First name
*
Last name
*
Password
*
Confirm Password
*
Specialties
*
Auto Services
Beauty
Home Services
Insurance
Legal Services
Medical Services
Pet Services
Restaurants
Subspecialties
Phone #1
Phone #2
Email
*
Web addres
State
*
Choose...
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
City
Address
Zip
Description
AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION — Adequacy/Inadequacy of Warnings— Clarity/Ambiguity of instructions, contracts, rivers, etc.— Deception/Truthfulness of advertising— Male-Female misunderstandings— Resistance/Consent to physical intimacy— Date rape— Sexual harassment TYPICAL CASES -- Someone gets injured using a product, sues the maker or seller who claims that the accident wouldn't have happened had the customer heeded their warning label or followed their instructions, and an opinion is needed on the clarity or adequacy of the warning or instructions. -- One party claims that another's advertising is false or misleading, and an opinion is needed on the match or mismatch between the advertisement's claim and the characteristics of the product or service provided. -- Claims differ regarding the interpretation of a contract, liability clause, waiver, or similar document, and an opinion is needed as to its "correct," or most likely, interpretation. -- A party has a legal obligation to provide certain information to the public (as in a class action notice, for example), and an opinion is needed on the adequacy of that communication effort. -- One party claims that another forced sexual intimacy and an opinion is needed as to whether consent to intimacy was communicated. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS -- Ph.D. in Communication, Pennsylvania State University, 1970 -- Professor Emeritus, Communication, University of California at Davis -- Officially recognized as among the "Top 1% of Communication Scholars" of the 1970's, 1980's, and 1990's -- Author of 5 books, scores of peer-reviewed research publications, and over 100 peer-reviewed research papers -- Eighteen professional excellence awards for articles and papers EXPERT WITNESS EXPERIENCE 75 cases — 53 for Plaintiff, 18 for Defense / 21 Depositions / 2 Jury Trials / 3 Bench Trials EMPIRICAL SUPPORT A unique service that I can sometimes provide is to test my opinions empirically. An expert's opinion is, after all, only an opinion. As such, it is a hypothesis or prediction. Sometimes these opinions can be tested and scientifically "proven," just as researchers in communication, psychology, and other social sciences test their hypotheses. As an example, in one case where my opinion was that a warning was inadequate, we tested the original warning against several variations that I predicted would be more effective. The data showed that virtually nobody understood the original, while practically everybody understood all of the variations, and thus we supported the opinion that the original was inadequate. WEB PAGE www.MotleyExpert.com
Image
Already registered?
Register